Let's recapture in a minute that magnificent section of the CQC in which Juanjo of the Church was analyzing holders of the press who were transmitting the things of a form so twisted that, who was not reading the content with attention, good might think that there was happening the opposite to what in fact it was going on.
It titles this way the ABC, immediately after the IU position as regards to the Town hall of Torrejón, which was refusing up to recent dates to register foreigners in irregular situation:
“ IU is sorry that Torrejón has rectified taken only by the "social alarm".
If one should not know the IU position, good might think for the holder that this one organization is sorry that the Town hall of Torrejón rectifies in his position, and that also it should make it gone by something so banal like the “social alarm”.
A more correct holder would have been, then, slightly such that:
“IU is congratulated on the Torrejón rectification as regards the registration of irregular”.
Unless … unless the ABC was trying to give an insensitive and unreasonable IU image, presenting it like an organization that applauds the inhuman dealing to the foreigners in irregular situation. If this was the case, we recommend a holder as that continues:
“IU changes the handle into high place into the widespread arm: sieg heil!”
The Course of journalistic Ethics limits itself to recommending, as it is habitual, the second holder, and more in these you date where, as well it was predicting Fontdevilla, the melon of the xenophobia has been opened officially.
No comments:
Post a Comment