IUN-NEB: a resolution that saddens me and disappoints me

For Javi
The last time that I spoke in my previous house on an Izquierda Unida federation I did it on IUN-NEB. In that occasion he was applauding the one that was considering a decision (that of integrase in Na-Bai) based on a few “simple, clear and sensible parameters”.
I today speak again about IUN-NEB, but this one time, unfortunately, to express my deep sadness and disappointment for a “resolution on Cuba” (that as it seems they have raised also to the Navarrese Parliament).
The Navarrese partners share the explanatory simplicity of those declarations on Na-Bai, but they have lost certainly the clarity and the good sense.
It saddens me because it seems really distressing to me that partners promote or vote in favor of a resolution on Cuba so generic that he might vote for it in favor up to Hope Aguirre. It does without the most minimal analysis … neither rigorously nor slightly rigorously: no analysis of no type, only one generic declaration that does impossibly to understand what extension it has or in what it materializes.
Concepts as the "freedom", “civil rights“, “the citizenship” or the "human rights" have to be contextualizados, because like notions especially abstract and malleable they can allude to things that are, finally, opposite.
The whole world can understand, for moving the example to our State, which when a leader speaks the Basque PP about the full achievement of the Human rights in Basque Country speaks of imprisoning the people for meeting in the LAB head office to organize itself politically; on the other hand when Ezker Batua to speak about the full achievement of the DDHH in Basque Country speaks exactly otherwise. Would it make a resolution Ezker Batua on the situation of the DDHH in Basque Country that was asumible for Basagoiti? Obviously not. Of course they would say, with the whole reason: "it is that when you and I speak about Human rights, master of the PP, we speak about different things, so I am going to be very concrete”.
He was saying at first that, to part of growing sad, also I am disappointed: as I read there are after the resolution the intelligent people who surprises me that it could not have done anything better. Personally, if he wanted posicionarme on the topic of a sane form, better it would have given form of resolution to the article of Hugo Martínez Abarca (entry that yes that expresses good ideas of simple, clear and sensible form, and that also can be assumed – I believe - for the majority of persons that we are part of this organization).